4-ways-skiing-hurt-our-environment-that-many-dont-know-about

4 Ways Skiing Hurt Our Environment That Many Don’t Know About

With the winter season approaching fast, many of us are already planning visiting our favorite ski resorts. Snowboarding and skiing have become an annual event that many people look forward to. I couldn’t blame you. These winter activities are a great way to enjoy the year’s most unforgiving season.

But before you pack your skis, suits, ski stuff, and even the best ski goggles you just bought at http://winterbadass.com/, have you ever considered the ecological effects of this winter activity? Have you ever thought about how the complicated and energy-demanding infrastructures of ski resorts affect the environment? Have you considered the carbon footprint you leave when you ski?

Chances are you’re not aware of any of these.

It’s sad that many are unaware of the ecological costs related to resort skiing – much less, the solutions to these.

So, how does skiing punish the environment? Let me count the ways.deforestation

  1. Disturbance to wildlife

Global climate change already threatens the fragile ecosystem atop these snowcapped mountains, and further interference from resort-goers adds more stressor. Damaging vegetation, scaring wildlife and compacting soils greatly impacts the ecological unit. Some of these animals are forced to adapt but many choose to flee.

  1. Massive deforestation

Many ski resorts are situated in otherwise forested areas. Creating these resorts require cutting a large amount of vegetation to give way to ski trails, equipment and other ski-related infrastructure. This fragmentation of the landscape may seem appealing for humans but not for the creatures in the wild. Any changes in the landscape and deforestation negatively impact the habitat quality of animals.

  1. Increased water use

Due to climate change, most ski resorts experience a shorter duration of winter, with thawing periods occurring more frequently. To ensure that they provide continuous services to their patrons, most of these resorts use artificial snow to keep the slopes frozen. But creating artificial snow demands great volumes of water, often pumping from rivers, lakes and artificial ponds. For instance, a snowmaking machine consumes around 100 gallons of water per minute to make artificial snow.

  1. Energy consumption

With lots of massive equipment relying on fuel, resort skiing is a very energy-demanding operation. Ski resorts emit a huge amount of greenhouse gases that further contributes to global warming. For instance, operating electricity-powered ski lifts for a month would consume about the same energy needed to power around four households in a year. Moreover, the ski runs that groom the trails and are operated every night require about 5 gallons of diesel per hour – that’s added greenhouse gas emissions.

These are just four environmental impacts that directly resulting from skiing. Fuel used by ski resort-goers as they travel to the resort and the garbage they throw at the site are other things that are indirectly related to skiing.

So, this winter season don’t just excitedly look for the best ski goggles for 2016, broaden up your awareness at how skiing actually damages our planet. Consider things that you can do to help mitigate its environmental impacts. Choose ski resorts that have actively made measures to minimize negative effects.

Is Hunting Good or Bad for The Environment? This One’s a Must-Read

Is Hunting Good or Bad for The Environment? This One’s a Must-Read

I recently joined a local hunting club in their monthly hunting trip – although hunting is not really my kind of thing. I just thought of it as a perfect time to go to the outdoors. Armed with the latest hunting gears and air rifles, much like the ones you can see at review sites like RifleJudge.com, we trekked the outdoors and camped for a couple of nights.

We had a small debate on a question about hunting. To be honest, this question has baffled me ever since: Is hunting is good or bad for the environment?

Obviously, hunters would say it doesn’t harm the environment but when you ask environmentalists, they’d probably say otherwise. When I read about this, I always end up with an overarching “yes” and “no” answers. Truly, it’s a debatable issue that I would attempt to thresh out in this post. We’ll set aside questions on the ethics and morality of hunting and try to focus on its impact on the environment.

Man has been hunting since time immemorial. For thousands of years, we have depended on hunting for sustenance. In fact, hunting was a necessary life skill that man needed to learn. But as our civilization had shifted from hunting to domesticating animals and cultivating lands, the need to hunt has become more for entertainment rather than as a necessity.

Many environmentalists say that there is no need to humans nowadays to still go out to the outdoors to kill animals. They point out that hunting usually targets vulnerable and endangered species. They point out that taking out even one member in the food cycle can damage the balance in the eco-system.

On the other hand, hunting enthusiasts consider the number of games as very minimal and should have no impact on the environment. Over the recent years, the number of hunters has considerably declined, meaning the hunting population is aging fast.  The number of hunting expeditions has also decreased which means there are fewer games.

While hunting in the past may have admittedly gone uncontrolled, hunting today is well regulated. As matter of fact, hunters do pay certain fees to authorities, which are intended for environmental protection and conservation. There are also specified areas where hunting is permitted. Without necessary permits, hunters can be held liable for doing unlawful hunting. Further, there are also only specified species that can be hunted. These species are carefully studied and approved. Usually, hunting events are approved in territories where there is an imbalance in the number of a given species.

For conservative environmentalists, any attempt to interrupt the biodiversity of a given territory can have uncalculated effects in the long run. These effects may not be apparent at first but can still cause an imbalance over time.

As for me, I don’t see anything wrong about regulated hunting. I’ve seen how responsible hunting can contribute to the further upkeep of the outdoors. What may be bad is open hunting as there is no clear-cut definition on what can be hunted. It would be great if authorities do their job and ensure that hunters are well controlled. On the other side, hunters must also be responsible and follow rules.

Personal Tips for Living Environmental Friendly Life

Personal Tips for Living Environmental Friendly Life

Wіth global wаrmіng becoming more іn-уоur-fасе еvеrу day, реорlе the wоrld over are lооkіng fоr wауѕ tо bе more еnvіrоnmеntаllу frіеndlу. There аrе a lot оf thіngѕ that уоu can do to hеlр ѕlоw thе dеѕtruсtіоn thаt increases glоbаl warming оn an hourly bаѕіѕ. Hеrе аrе ѕоmе tips on hоw to be mоrе еnvіrоnmеntаllу frіеndlу and decrease уоur carbon footprint in which juѕt аbоut аnуоnе саn tаkе раrt.

Buу Grееn Prоduсtѕ

Thеrе аrе tоnѕ оf nаturаl products on thе market thаt аrе сhеареr, safer, аnd еаѕіеr tо uѕе than thе hazardous tоxіс сhеmісаlѕ that wе have bееn uѕіng fоr уеаrѕ. Mаnу products like blеасh саuѕе unknоwn hаrm tо the humаn bоdу аnd pollute оur lаkеѕ and streams at an unbelievable rate. If you rеаllу want tо lіvе a grееnеr lifestyle, one оf thе first thіng thаt you can dо is replace the tоxіс сhеmісаlѕ thаt аrе рrеѕеnt іn уоur hоmе. 

Read more